Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and
large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Problems such as the rising of global temperatures and health problems had a crucial
impact on the relationship with our everyday life, so that public institutions started
building awareness over their citizen, on how impactful would be a behavioral
change for the environment. For this main reason, in this essay I will discuss why I
disagree with the statement above.
To begin with, mankind cannot think Itself as autonomous from the environment
around, which means that our actions are tightly related to natural events. As a
matter of fact, a research conducted in areas subjected to earthquakes, such as Chile,
Hawai or Japan, noticed that the power of these calamities doubled since the
beginning of the 50’s, when governments gave permission to withdraw oil from the
soil. Yet, earth shakings would likely increase if members of parliament will keep on
permitting such exploitation on behalf of one country’s development.
But how can people prove their actions are still valuable to make a change in this
current situation? How can a change in our day-to-day life make a difference? The
last Day Zero in Mexico was an excellent example of it. In fact, in 2013 Mexico City
was about to run out of water, because of the massive drought of North America’s
water sources.As a consequence of overusing and wasting potable water, the issue
became a matter of millions of Mexicans. Accordingly, people started saving water, using it just when in need, so that it soon started flowing again, moreover avoiding
shortages.Eventually, the examples here provided proved how powerful individual’s actions are
over government policies, and how impactful these could be for the next generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 15, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ought of North America’s water sources.As a consequence of overusing and wasting ...
^^
Line 21, column 11, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Eventually
...ing again, moreover avoiding shortages.Eventually, the examples here provided proved how ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, moreover, so, still, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34306569343 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00979628458 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.4573082537 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785549175512 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351696814809 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463800431296 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0218456150035 0.151304729494 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371810391285 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.