Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Throughout history, learning has become an appreciated effort as people understood it is the foundation for later improvements. Hence, teachers who led the learners through a sure-fire way became a significant role as well. The value of this role nowadays, not only has not decreased, but also is highly appreciated since, education is a higher priority for people in comparison to the past and the effects of teachers on one's personality is undeniable. The first aspect of current discussion demanding a keen contemplation is that today human beings depend entirely on teachers for gaining basic knowledge which is taught in schools. In the past few people were able to study, and hence their ideas about teachers and the concept of learning differed Breatly from ours. Since the ordinary people, did not have studied themselves, they did respect teachers for their knowledge; thus, it might seem the society appreciated teachers greater. But the truth is that, as going to school and studying became widespread, and people understood the huge effects of this stratum in their futures' developments, they appreciated teachers in a different way, not for their knowledge, as themselves were educated, but for their principle role in country's progression
Moreover, the role of a teacher in shaping one's personality is crystal clear to everyone. The busy and preoccupied today parents, seldom find a free time spending with their children, teaching them the life concepts. Hence, it is up to the teachers to develop students personality by sharing desirable characteristics. This effective role has confined our attention more than before, making us to appreciate and value it as well.
However, considering other aspects of the article leads me to mention that although teachers affect society in a number of ways, by the development of technology, other means of learning are offered that may be considered as lowering the value of teachers. The internet has provided many opportunities for people to study and learn a variety of subjects easily. the online classes for instance, do let students to participate in different courses; but to tell the truth, they cannot still take the place of schools and teachers, as they are much more valuable sources of knowledge, reliable ones actually, that give a wider perspective while discussing subjects and answering to the questions. Hence, teachers do have their prior value, in spite of other technological methods for learning.
All in all, to put everything in a nutshell in my vantage point, it is nothing more than a misunderstanding to say people appreciate teachers less than before. Actually their value has risen due to the increase in people knowledge about their influence in society. Technology has its own place in people's lives, maybe as an assistance, but in my opinion can never take teachers' place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...developments, they appreciated teachers in a different way, not for their knowledge, as themselves...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...eover, the role of a teacher in shaping ones personality is crystal clear to everyon...
^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...and learn a variety of subjects easily. the online classes for instance, do let stu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in my opinion, in spite of, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 30.3222958057 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1373.03311258 175% => OK
No of words: 461.0 270.72406181 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21908893709 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92725935201 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 145.348785872 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544468546638 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 419.366225166 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.4213545313 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.529411765 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1176470588 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283027198551 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813403139116 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607198433024 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154330207881 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499166245039 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 63.6247240618 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.