Some believe that governments and large companies play key roles in solving environmental issues, while individuals have little impact on them. I partly disagree with this notion and believe that environmental problems can not be tackled without the help of people.
First of all, we should bear in mind that governments and large enterprises consist of individuals, and from the most junior roles to the highest levels, there are people who run the organizations. Apparently, a huge part of decision-making in leadership roles, roots in the personal beliefs of the individual, which is why we opt for the presidents whose values are mostly in line with ours. For instance, Mr trump's decision to quit the Paris agreement was mainly driven by his opinion on the absurdity of global warming, which was in total contrast with his former and later peers.
On the other hand, the importance of effective leadership is inevitable in terms of struggling with devastating issues like environmental matters. This is undisputed that the largest firms in each industry, are the most influential leaders of that sector, and the consumers' behavior is totally affected by their actions. As an example, in the case that no eco-friendly product is offered by producers, there is not a considerable step to be taken by individuals in order to change the harmful consumption patterns.
To sum up, from my personal standpoint, although the high effectiveness of leadership practices is apparent, the great role of people and consumers, as the basic elements of society, shall not be undertaken. This is how nations can manage to overcome ecological disasters, by calling all the potential members into action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...uential leaders of that sector, and the consumers behavior is totally affected by their a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ge the harmful consumption patterns. to sum up, from my personal standpoint, al...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, so, while, for instance, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23897058824 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03573859249 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.0257708728 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966653693877 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362987752388 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039395245937 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585510799437 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508672648637 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.