Individuals can do nothing to improve the environmnt only governments and large campanies can make and different.
Novadays, majority of people can do improve the environment and moreover can do different works therefor i agree this both views.
Firstly, people do what kinds of help to improve the environment but same people they are dont help oppositely bring damage the environment. Currently a lots of people plant trees, foliage tree and fruit tree. Trees help to us,, how'' the trees absorb carbon dioxide and to us take out oxygen. Therefore we must plant trees, flowers, planting begin from now. But same people did not know themselve cut a tree. Just like that for this perason create new laws the goverenment in this laws whether someone cut trees to this person be pulled at big level to penately.
Secondly, goverenments and big campanies to improve environment do several works. For example they are be put variety kinds of gerbegbin majority areas. With this is they unite own points to improve the environmnt. Goverments and big campanies can do the other hand to improve environment they are decreasing personal cars and they for use be put mostly public transport. In addition to they can do help the environmnt, they must do dont drive ancient and demajed cars. Becouse this cars give mostly pollutans to environment.
In conclusion, people cab do to imorove the environment becouse live in tis environment very benefit for helth themselves. As a prime example admittedly not only government and big campanies maybe do people join own portion to improve the environmnt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...oreover can do different works therefor i agree this both views. Firstly, peopl...
^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he environment but same people they are dont help oppositely bring damage the enviro...
^^^^
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...bring damage the environment. Currently a lots of people plant trees, foliage tree and...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...ge tree and fruit tree. Trees help to us,, how the trees absorb carbon dioxide and...
^^
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rbon dioxide and to us take out oxygen. Therefore we must plant trees, flowers, planting ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ason create new laws the goverenment in this laws whether someone cut trees to this ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... do several works. For example they are be put variety kinds of gerbegbin majority...
^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...an do help the environmnt, they must do dont drive ancient and demajed cars. Becouse...
^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion, people cab do to imorove the environment becouse live in tis environm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99593495935 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67387299639 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.06105933 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9333333333 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233284042339 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830884349295 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994054245399 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177363655786 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992580395372 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.