Industrial pollution is increasing all around the world. Some people say that the most effective way to tackle the problem is to Tax companies that are causing the pollution. Others argue that, there are other ways to control the situation.Discuss both vi

All over the world pollution is increasing day by day. One of the considerable pollution is Industrial pollution and that is trying to solve. Some think that there is no other means to prevent this problem than to impose tax, while others, myself included, think that numerous steps are available to tackle this problem.

Paying tax is most preferred solution to solve the problem of pollution. Provided that companies have to pay more tax just because of emitting toxic things and making environment hazardous, they will try to emit less poisonous things or reduce the amount of emissions. As a result, pollution which is causing by those companies will be reduced and the environmental will be less polluted. Netherland government apply the law of tax to large organisation which polluting their surroundings. To avoid paying extra money every companies are trying to reduce less toxic ingredients as they can. Thus, the rate of poisonous items have reduced and Netherlands become more eco-friendly.

On the other hand, other effective measure could be recycle the waste. If companies reuse their waste by recycling, they may throw less waste into the environment and it will decrease the pollution. Another means is that use sustainable materials for production. Suppose that raw materials are environmental friendly these will also produce eco-friendly product. Chonsequently, surrounding of our will not face any bad situation and it will not pollute.

To put in a nutshell, impose tax to handle the increasing industrial pollution will be good idea, as well as, recycling waste and using sustainable raw material will also be effective means. Government should also take some necessary steps to resolve this problem and we also conscious about that.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'will' requires base form of the verb: 'face'
Suggestion: face
...nsequently, surrounding of our will not faced any bad situation and it will not pollu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'pollute'
Suggestion: pollute
...faced any bad situation and it will not polluted. To put in a nutshell, impose tax to...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28787878788 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89885351455 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7368900993 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196845191258 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676038453482 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571435071337 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122681886896 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580615350869 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.