Intelligence is the most important quality of leaders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that intelligence plays the key role when it comes to management. I somewhat disagree with this view as other redeeming features are also of equal importance to leaders.
There are two main reasons why intelligent workers may not be ideal leaders. The first honorable characteristics widely regconized among standout managers is dedication. It is a fact that managerial roles may not devote sufficient time and energy to their organizations if they are not dedicated to their workplaces. The more resources the responsible individuals allocate to their workplace, the more their places of work are likely to be beneficial. Another valuable quality of excellent managers is interpersonal skills, which enables people to communiate effectively to coleagues, surbodinates or senior wokers. The ability not only saves their companies from wasting resources due to misinformation and misunderstanding, but enhances productivity. Thus, apart from smartness, dedication and communicating productively with others are both significants.
Admittedly, gifted leaders with intelligence are undeniably able to make a great contribution to their community. By making appropriate decisions with accurate timing, these workers can help their firms overcome difficulties or boost profit margins. Intelligence, however, is insufficient for becoming well-rounded leaders; without dedicating and efficient communication with coworkers, managers cannot excel at their positions.
In sum, I mostly object to the perception that thinking quickly is the most critical value of people who lead others. Both commitment and interpersonal skills act as predecesor to the success of ones as managers, albeit cleverness is crucial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nking quickly is the most critical value of people who lead others. Both commitme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.952 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38754424325 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9398954025 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091930963994 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302332784351 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380749573364 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609260802491 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315032965708 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.