intelligent students should be taught separately from other students To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believed that gifted students should not learn with ordinary students. I agree that talents need customized study plans to develop their potential fully, but I do not think they should stay away from the majority.
Intelligent students need special care to develop their talents fully. They are usually fast learners with deep thought and demonstrate outstanding levels of aptitude or competence in one or more domains, which means standard teaching model would not suit them. Instead, personalized curriculums, including supplementary enriching high-level material and project-oriented teaching styles, should be employed. Besides, talent development programs after school can also be a plus point. Jeff Bezos, for example, the founder of Amazon, have been invited in a science program at the University of California, which improved his computer skill and helped to prepare him for his future career.
While an individualized teaching plan is necessary, separating talents from other students might cost their social skills. Due to different mindsets and concerns, most intelligent students suffered from lacking proper social skills for interacting with people. Taking them away from ordinary people would only deteriorate the situation. There is a study on the students who graduated from a famous talent school in China named the University of Science and Technology of China. It suggests that from the perspective of personal achievement and influence, students who graduated from here tend to end up being specialists rather than CEOs or managers. They have not shown superior accomplishments than other students with the same IQ but graduated from traditional education.
In conclusion, the development of students' talents should not come at the cost of students' social skills. A personalized learning plan in traditional school would be better than studying separately from the majority.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68055555556 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93564427856 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9640949965 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301627517646 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106123208656 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613067550293 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196296490179 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713708318845 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.