some people think schools should only teach students academic subjects. Others think schools should also teach students how to discriminate between right and wrong. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
People have different views on whether teachers should take part in ethical education. In terms of teaching practice, I believe it's crucial that students got both academic and moral education in school.
Some argued that teachers' first priority is fully unlocking students' intellectual potential. To do that, teachers should concentrate on preparing and executing well-rounded teaching plans. Advancing the professional skillset with cutting-edge technology could be a plus point, but the moral part of education should be left at home. While academic knowledge might be helpful to do things right, it cannot tell students what the right thing to do. It is the latter that determines the essential quality of a person. Without guidance on moral judgment, a highly educated criminal could do devastating harm to society.
Besides, due to the sheer amount of time students spend in school, ethical guidance is inevitable. Teachers are highly involved in activities like ruling, mediating, punishing, and rewarding, all of which are morally concerned. For example, problems like what is the right thing to do when they find classmates plagiarize in the test are quite common in school.
And from the perspective of individual circumstances, the economic and educational status of parents can be so dramatically different that fulfilled moral development is far from guaranteed. Some parents may lack adequate skill set like communication skills to teach. Others may be too busy to help their children with ethical issues. In contrast, a teacher with professional qualifications is more competent to be a moral mentor.
In conclusion, in addition to ensuring academic success, teachers must also function as counselors to guide students out of ethical dilemmas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68265682657 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06831838117 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0739782134 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265224817057 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805762038621 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749037263193 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143384360903 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855956771489 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.