International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
In today’s integrated and interdependent world, globalization has permeated every aspect of our lives, laying the foundation for the flourishing of transnational tourism. A controversy is widely sparked as to whether global travel exerts a positive or negative impact on the status quo. From my perspective, civilians worldwide would reap more benefits than drawbacks from the upsurge in overseas arrivals.
On the one hand, there are several implications when it comes to transnational travels. First and foremost, this kind of tourism is held accountable for environmental degradation. Visitors, in particular, can take a heavy toll on the intact surroundings by ruthless actions such as littering leftover foods or vandalism in places of interest. Besides, a huge influx of tourists on a frequent basis is synonymous with a dramatic increase in demand for accommodation, which requires public and private sectors to erect more hotels and resorts to satisfy the need. In order to do so, deforestation and loss of natural habitats to make way for infrastructure construction are inevitable.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned downsides, there are justifiable reasons why transnational tourism should be fostered on a large scale. The first worth-nothing point is none other than economic benefit. In recent years, tourism has become the primary industry in many nations, especially third-world ones, generating huge revenue for host countries. In other words, an expansion of tourism raises the demand for locally produced goods and services, and in turn, increases their relative prices. International travel also serves as a panacea for employment problems when hotels, restaurants or tourist destinations are usually in need of staff. Those who do not possess a tertiary graduation degree can take advantage of their practical skills and hands-on experience to become local tour guides or taxi drivers. In addition, cross-cultural understanding is simultaneously fostered with tourism. Initially, the inherent discrepancy in terms of tradition and religious belief between locals and foreign tourists may be significant. However, regular interaction would facilitate better mutual understanding, which paves the way for more cross-country business and cultural cooperation in the long term. For example, irrespective of clashes in the past, Vietnam now has expunged the long-standing grievances with America, heading towards a firm relationship as well as collaboration on political and economic scopes.
All things meticulously considered, although tourism is the major culprit of many ecological issues, it still seems to me that it plays inarguably a pivotal role in the economic growth of host countries, alongside enhancing mutual understanding between them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, so, still, third, well, for example, in addition, in particular, kind of, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71186440678 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28713072187 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658192090395 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.66911658 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134231886802 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396596641641 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282708171939 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078713210718 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365303247465 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.