International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
A booming industry, the international tourism has gotten the momentum quickly. Undoubtedly, it benefits tourist places enormously. However, it has also several disadvantages too. This essay is an attempt to evaluate, whether the merits outweigh the demerits.
Looking at the positive side, by levying heavy taxes on foreigners, the government can earn a handsome revenue, which makes the nation's economy even stronger. Further, as tourists come from remote areas, they need several facilities, such as, accommodations, foods and tour guides, which increase the employment prospects for local folks. For example, there are several countries, whose citizens are totally dependent on the tourism. Moreover, people get an opportunity to demonstrate their local culture to foreigners, which improves the respect of the nation on the global platform.
On the negative side, increasing transportation increases air as well as noise pollution in the local area, which can have a deleterious effect on the health of local dwellers. Additionally, heavy littering wastage by visitors, makes the situation worse for the locals. For instance, it is surveyed by the National Tourist Department that, they find a million of tons of waste, every year, around only one famous place, the red fort, in India. As, there are a number of such places available in India, the total wastage is astoundingly high. Although, the amount of the disposal of these wastages is lower than the revenue, generated by the tourism.
To conclude, despite, several disadvantages of this industry, it has a plethora of benefits too. So, according to me the advantages definitely outweigh the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...arn a handsome revenue, which makes the nations economy even stronger. Further, as tour...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48449612403 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9763328406 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0143410972 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158390124945 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534548983524 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410774489355 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104446165299 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495222819472 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.