More and more people are moving away from agriculture background to relocate to cities in order to look for work. What will be the consequences of this. What solutions can you offer.
It has been found that an increasing number of individuals are migrating towards cities for the sake of employment after quitting their farming profession. This can cause sheer competition among the inhabitants of the cities and can also lead to unemployment. However, there are some ways that can assist in alleviating these issues.
The predominant challenge that urban residents and migrated masses can have is the competition which they can face in the developed locations. Sometimes, jobs are limited and accommodation can also be a reinforcing problem for those who shifted to urban areas.As a result, there can be high chances of congestion in the streets, roads, hospitals and grocery stores, specifically, if the government is not prepared.In addition, some of the employees can also suffer exploitation, as recruiters can a have a number of options available who are willing to work even less than the lower wages.
However, there is a number of solutions that can be offered to mitigate these situations. Firstly, the government can build more facilities such as hospitals, shopping malls, educational institutes and recreational centres in the outskirt areas.In other words, this will not only increase the employment rate in the rural places but also people living in distant lands can have better facilities available and they will stay where they are living, consequently, the state can also save those who are indulged in farming.Furthermore, those who chose to move to cities should be protected by state laws. In this context, authorities should set rules, for example, setting minimum wage to prevent exploitation of workers.This will safeguard their rights.
In conclusion, the government's intervention in the rural areas can provide better job opportunities for their residents and the functional rights of those who have become part of the city can be protected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...em for those who shifted to urban areas.As a result, there can be high chances of ...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ally, if the government is not prepared.In addition, some of the employees can als...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...government is not prepared.In addition, some of the employees can also suffer exploitation,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...reational centres in the outskirt areas.In other words, this will not only increas...
^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
... save those who are indulged in farming.Furthermore, those who chose to move to cities shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...wage to prevent exploitation of workers.This will safeguard their rights. In conc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ard their rights. In conclusion, the governments intervention in the rural areas can pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3771043771 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0935634092 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.006995722 49.4020404114 304% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 177.444444444 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.4444444444 7.06120827912 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218111222125 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934334104437 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417074667661 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134473407815 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384416949348 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.