The tourism industry have expanded tremendously in last two decades. Most of the countries have been benefitted by the flow of the tourist. However, with the increase in the number of travellers, there occurs an environmental risk resulting in pollution of the surroundings which also affect the locals. I strongly believe that, tourism helps to grow a country economically, which fairly outweighs the risk towards the environment, as this risk can be managed efficiently.
Tourism is one of the most important ascpect for a growing economy in many countries. For example, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam are few countries having a strong economy due to tourism. An advantage of becoming a popular destination brings a lot of benefits for the locals. Like they can earn their leaving by selling locally made garments and accessories, some can even guide the tourist and share the knowledge of local history. So, in other words, it brings employment for the people residing there. Also, government gets a lot of money out of tourism. The tourist tax are quiet high and this directly goes to the government which can be used for the better development of the country.
A major problem to the tourism is littering on land as well as in water. For instance, Phi Phi island in Thailand has seen increase in water pollution by two folds in last 5 years, caused by increased flow of people from around the globe. As, the number of tourist travels in sea by the mean of boat, this pollutes the water the most. In order to prevent further damage to the water and the marine life, government can implement the use of Eco friendly boats that do not spill oil in the sea, thus saving the environment and beauty of that popular destination.
In my opinion, the economical growth that a country gets through tourism, is very crucial for the development of that country. As, the factors related to the environmetal damage can be manages easily by implementing strict rules and regulation by the government. Positive side of the International tourism fairly overshadows its negative impact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Phi
...land as well as in water. For instance, Phi Phi island in Thailand has seen increase in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ular destination. In my opinion, the economical growth that a country gets through tour...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96848137536 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79658215503 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6708905859 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179041167741 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591735265251 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052325949885 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105640334044 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449099100563 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.