International tourism has greatly benefited many places. However, there have been major concerns about its impact on the local environment and inhabitants. Do the negative impacts of international tourism outweigh the benefits
These days, it is true that more people find themselves interested in traveling. However, this essay argues that the benefits are eclipsed by the drawbacks because, despite the increase in revenues for local individuals and governments, it can lead to deforestation and social problems.
On the one hand, tourism plays an important role as a large potential source of revenue. In other words, when tourists travel, they demand many services, including accommodations, food, souvenirs, and even leisure activities, which creates more employment in the local areas. As a result, there will be an increase in income tax contributions to the budget of local governments, which directly boost the economy of the host country.
On the other hand, despite those aforementioned advantages, there are some undeniable adverse effects of tourism on local areas. Firstly, the rapid influx of tourists into a country can result in a lack of accommodations. In order to fulfill their demands, local governments would have to provoke deforestation in order to have places to build hotels, restaurants, and resorts, which leads to the cutting down of myriad trees and the extinction of a wide range of animals. Secondly, with the massive hordes of travelers into countries, residents are more likely to suffer from pollution due to the increasing of waste and usage of vehicles. As a result, people who live in poor air quality are more easily to get asthma and many others respiratory hazards.
In conclusion, the fact that increased tourism leads to deforestation and social problems clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can create job openings for local residents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30943396226 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97191313987 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6651648231 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.909090909 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119345608817 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405714447594 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031956066378 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717493281973 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141711891591 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.