It is difficult for people in cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solutions?
It is true that citizens are struggling with getting enough physical exercise. This phenomenon may come from the lack of facilities as well as time, which can be addressed by the government as well as schools and business.
To begin with, myriad reasons can keep people off their feet; however, the shortage of time is identified as one of the biggest culprits behind the decreased physical activity. As the hectic daily schedule puts one in a constant state of stress and hurry, draining most of their energy and time, a reluctantness to exercise would ensue. In addition, the dearth of parks and green spaces in urban settings is another factor that limits exercise participation in urban areas.
There are some approaches to tackling this problem. First, urban designers and planners should create supportive built environments to facilitate physical activity engagement. As green spaces and recreational facilities are the perk of a great neighborhood, their ubiquitous presence would encourage residents to make active living part of their daily routine. Moreover, companies and schools should join hands in incorporating regular exercise into work hours and school hours. By instilling exercise sessions during office hours, businesses are creating fitness opportunities for workers to stay fit and healthy, thereby increasing energy levels, reducing sick days, and boosting employee productivity.
In conclusion, urban infrastructure and the pressures of modern life are major barriers against active living in big cities. Therefore, effective land use along with the promotion of work-life balance will be essential to achieving the goal of making physical activity a regular and natural part of people’s daily lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5320754717 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87751623446 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645283018868 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2936306494 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13430570378 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462154771981 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512618121174 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754768966913 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175157191072 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.