The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays when almost everyone has an access to the internet, we can easily travel all over the world to research the patterns of other people’s lives. But in my opinion, the online traveling keeps us distant from truly life in different countries.
The argument against this is that cartain number of people, espesialy younger ones, can use the internet in order to learn the language, meet new people and do the local sightseeing via Skype, for example. There are a lot of programs that allow people to enter every museum and cross every street, when you are actually sitting at home. For instance, Art Basel is a well-established modern art gallery that broadcast every online event. Those started in the middle 80-s and started to spread with the rise of internet penetration. Another example of how the internet enchance the chances to deeply understand other people is to learn their language.
Nonetheless, if you want to understand how people live in different countries, it is definitely not enough to travel online due to the tremendous loss of cultural uniquenesses. Many researches shows that there is a strict correlation between physical presence and effectiveness of studying. Those results could be extrapolated to the problem of realizing the behavior of people from different countries. Ofline traveling allows you to be not only a passive viewer, but also an active participants in local’s lives. For instance, you can live in foreign family and research the ways of communication, solving problems and other processes.
Another reason why the internet is not the solution for all is that there are sertain groups of people who can barely use internet, for example old people.
To sum up, I solely belive that internet traveling is a appealing attept to realize some facts about foreign people, but only ofline traveling can bring the full picture of behavioral patterns in foreign countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 84
- The author of the article suggests that this type of dinosaur was the inactive hunter and preferred to eat dead animals and eggs However the lecture argued that R robustus was an active hunter and could be hunted on other dinosaurs 61
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it 93
- Some people think that advertising plays a positive role whereas others refer to its negative impact Do you agree or disagree 90
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message State your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
Nowadays when almost everyone has an access to the internet, we can easily travel a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...olely belive that internet traveling is a appealing attept to realize some facts ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, nonetheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13099041534 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78260271133 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562300319489 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9035429931 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260148718197 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819974374201 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596629050348 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130684723878 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388629528165 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.