It is believed that people who read a lot of novels have developed better imagination and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Individuals who are engaged in habit of reading such as, novels are believed to have good communication skills and good virtual power than the person's involved in watching television. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement.
Supporters of opposing concept argue that, television acts as the information and relaxation box. As this technology provides us live updates of news around the world along with the pictures and makes easy to understand the impact occurred. Therefore there is less involvement of brain to imagine things. For example, News report about unforeseen conditions like floods or earthquake, reporters nowadays reach to the site and gives us the live information along with filming the place. However, watching television can improve the language skills to some extent but does not provide lasting effect.
Furthermore, people having the hobby of reading novels makes them greedy for knowledge. Reading activity keeps the human senses and brain active. For example, while reading a scene from novel, the person thinks through the writer's viewpoint and also tries to picture the image of the context. Moreover, reading replenishes our brain by involving in this type of exercise. This acts as a catalyst to improve the language skills as well as the imagination power.
In conclusion, watching television has some benefits, but it is true, advantages of reading creates a greater impact on one's knowledge of language and imagination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... television. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement. Supporters...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...easy to understand the impact occurred. Therefore there is less involvement of brain to i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...om novel, the person thinks through the writers viewpoint and also tries to picture the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38528138528 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77538136168 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3561433808 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6923076923 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214496316953 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675725072533 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641624661716 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124997892826 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619230885809 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.