Families are the banyan trees which protect their family members from heat of life. However, nowadays, families are not as close as they used to. Therefore, it is necessary to rectrospect the reasons of this fact.
According to my opinion, there are many reasons of increasing gap between families. Primarily, technology has changed the lifestyle of people. The spend more time in using gadgets rather than personal interaction. Further, privacy and generation gap is increasing among families. Moreover, rooms make a border for family members dur to more entertainment sources. Inflation is the major reason for increasing gap between families. Therefore, people from one place to another to earn bread and butter as well as for their education. In addition to it, due to hectic schedule people do not spend quality time with each other.
There are numerous ways to reduce the gap between families. First and foremost, sacrifice the personal activities and spend quality time with family members. Apart from that people should organised parties and celebrations. Moreover,wishes and greetings should be given to family members on special occasions. Further, one should break the eyes and there should not be any room for jealously. Therefore, appreciation must be done in front of other family members to enhance confidence. While, gadget time should be replaced by family time to become more close to each other.
In the epilogue, it is very consequential that people should live together because they need each other if they face any problem. This responsibility is not only to one individual but also to a every individual. Therefore, every person should try to keep in touch with their families.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...gy has changed the lifestyle of people. The spend more time in using gadgets rather than ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , wishes
...nised parties and celebrations. Moreover,wishes and greetings should be given to family...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r family members to enhance confidence. While, gadget time should be replaced by fami...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... not only to one individual but also to a every individual. Therefore, every pers...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, as for, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78063238045 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.5336186063 49.4020404114 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.3333333333 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 3.4128256513 381% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199639572534 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621884116052 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622998919262 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135080171747 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833456037176 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.34 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.