It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sports or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views an

People born with innate talents are often termed as genius or an expert. However, a vast population of the world lags this inbuilt capacity, so they depend upon other resources to improve their skills and knowledge. Eventually, either people succeed in acquiring the required knowledge or fails to commensurate with the talented population.
Whenever a person showed extraordinary precocious talents in his childhood, he probably will become a success product in his life when he is an adult. Not everyone get this opportunity to be distinguished within the crowd. There are various categories under which they show their ability. It may be in literacy, numeracy, science, music, art or creativity, sports the person becomes a prodigy. Apparently, these people are able to lead the others and excel in the field they are pioneering. Sometimes, even a born genius is dropped out of school for showing profound interest towards only a particular subject. For instance, Bill Gates and his friends were dismissed out of their school, such that they started their software building knowledge from their own garage. A knowledgeable person succeeds regardless of the environment he is subjected to live in.
In most of the people, talents are hidden. They do not showcase their capabilities. However, it is the responsible of the parents or the teacher to analyze the eclipsed inner energy and help them harness it in a more productive manner. Some people may not posses special power to even exhibit their inner brilliancy. These people are often termed as naïve. With further analysis of these kind of people shows that they are not exposed to the required resources to gain the knowledge. Moreover, even these people can be trained in their interested subject to master their latent power. There are many educational institutions offering a range of courses to train people and issue certificate of excellency. People can make use of this opportunity to upgrade themselves.
In my opinion, every child has talents that are rudimentary to their age, either it is not expressed or stimulated at the right age. The sole responsibility for the stimuli lies in the hands of the elders around them. Triggering the right talent from childhood aid them to elevate the passion towards building a successful career in the near future.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...rmed as naïve. With further analysis of these kind of people shows that they are not expos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding elders'?
Suggestion: the surrounding elders
...ty for the stimuli lies in the hands of the elders around them. Triggering the right talent from child...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a successful career in the near future.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, kind of, of course, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15079365079 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81159684976 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9137277543 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.652173913 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4347826087 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211601864614 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574116232145 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436035076623 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119357061221 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337029655694 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.