The charts illustrate the percentage of visitors from 3 different countries to US in the years 1988, 1990, 1992. The predominant countries used for comparison are Canada, Mexico and China with a negligible percentage of visitors from other countries.
The overall trend from the chart shows Canada occupying a majority portion followed by Mexico and China. Though there are fluctuations in the visitors from Mexico, the count is almost the same. There has been a considerable increase in the visitors from China over the given time period.
In 1988, visitors from Canada is observed to be for more than half of the total percentage. The Mexican visitors are nearly half the percentage of Canadian visitors. People from China is only half the percentage compared to the Mexican visitors covering only a 10% of the total which is even less than the visitors from other countries. However, by 1990 there is a tremendous increase in the visitors from China bagging about 28% of the total visitors. The percentage of Canadian and Mexican visitors shows a marginal decrease compared to 1988. In 1992, Chinese visitors accounts for the second position with nearly one third of the total as opposed to Mexican visitors. In spite of the decreasing pattern from Canada observed in 1992, it still holds majority of the percentage compared to the other countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The charts illustrate the percentage of visitors from 3 different countries to U...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tage of visitors from other countries. The overall trend from the chart shows Cana...
^^^
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entage compared to the other countries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, third, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08071748879 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65113078513 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452914798206 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2978400042 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4166666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374630578166 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165797507993 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114069252953 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292192925845 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854642388571 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.