In a letter to his friend the homeowner of a property juxtaposes two real estate firms - Adams realty and Fitch Realty. He shares his experience about the advantage of Adams Realty over Fitch Realty and advises his friend to choose Adams Realty to sell his house. Though the argument seems to substantiate the views of the author, there are few other flaws in the arguments that does not corroborate his argument.
To begin with, the comparison made with the number of real estate agents working for both the firms cannot primarily decide the nature of the real estate company. It is how smarter an agent works really matters. One cannot commensurate the number of real estate agents to the meticulous nature of the job completed by the entire firm. If Fitch realty proves to hold much diligent part time smart workers, the argument cannot be in line with the house owner's assumptions.
Furthermore, Contrasting the revenue of both the firms based on the real estate turnover proves skeptical. Does the revenue of a firm influence a person's decision on selecting the best real estate to sell his home? Adams realty can be a conglomeration of smaller firms and just the turnover is a collaborative effort of all other firms. If this statement holds truth, then the author's assumptions can merely hold flaws.
Finally, the author compares the scenario of Fitch real estate nearly a decade ago. He is not sure about the latest updates about the firm. We cannot list a profile for a firm just based on vague data acquired before a decade. Thus , the author failed to state the current status of the firm.
To conclude, is all these statements are accepted to possess reasonable truth, then the assumptions made by the house owner is implausible to the current situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...tch realty proves to hold much diligent part time smart workers, the argument cannot be i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ague data acquired before a decade. Thus , the author failed to state the current ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, really, so, then, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85761589404 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56671499839 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5303017683 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329892574233 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107665861953 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115709731845 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15768408256 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102369358429 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.