The technology breakthrough has impacted the education sector tremendously. There has been a shift in the materials provided to the children replacing the books and print outs with tablets and laptops. This is particularly predominant in a highly upgraded world class schools in the urban areas. There are both pros and cons in using technological items for learning purposes. In my opinion the shortcomings outweigh the advantages of using these technology.
Exposing the children to LED display as a routine can have a drastic impact in their eyesight. This has been observed in students who already have ample screen time at home. Apart from this, children are prone to serious addiction to the screen time. There can be a lot of diversions while using technological items. There is no proper assurance that children are only learning the specific educational topics. For example, a pre-teenager is easily attracted towards playing online games and a teenager is easily lured towards social media. Unless, there is a proper age restrictions imposed on the websites used, children cannot concentrate on the educational material as instructed. A proper didactic smart machines exclusively for children is the only way to improvise educational standards. Moreover, many of the teachers in the teaching community are not able to cope up with the exponentially changing technology used in education. There are many limitations observed from the primary school teachers who are not very well trained to meet the technological needs expected from the school. In fact, there seems to be a lacuna of knowledge about the usage of technology. Primary school teachers are expected to be some technicians rather than establishing a friendly bond with the students. Apparently, there is a void between the teacher and the students with no special interactions among them. Students lag in communication and social interactions with smart machines in hand on a daily routine.
However, there are also a few advantages rendered by using these smart items for education. The desktop publishing tools, multimedia effects and graphics, excel sheets which are projected for the students in classroom can make the classes more interesting and easier to grab the concepts when compared to the age old method of manual drawings by the teacher on blackboards. For example, a teacher can easily show the graph implementation of a linear equation or use colorful pie charts for data interpretation problems. Geography teacher can easily exhibit the maps with different gradations for landscapes and oceans. Such wonderful presentation can entrench the knowledge deeply in to the students and make them more inclined towards learning.
To recapitulate, technology has it's own best and worst impact. It all depends upon the right platform that we use it to help our future generations. Though, machines have supplanted many of the primitive models used in schools, a true social collaboration is achieved only with limited usage of technological items.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...omings outweigh the advantages of using these technology. Exposing the children to LED display ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...items. There is no proper assurance that children are only learning the specific ...
^^
Line 2, column 1070, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs expected" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'expecting' or 'to be expected'.
Suggestion: expecting; to be expected
...trained to meet the technological needs expected from the school. In fact, there seems t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h limited usage of technological items.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 478.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33891213389 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01568003603 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 802.8 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.546043305 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5185185185 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7037037037 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175031698645 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448299190837 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043187109451 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11351034958 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706577733551 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.