'United we stand, divided we fall' - indeed is true in the case where groupism is required to understand the underlying principles of a particular topic. The claim states that students must work together to complete assignments and is essential in a way to replace the traditional lecture based approach as well for the reason that it is vital for the students to gather experience through collaborative team work. In my opinion, I agree with the claim and the reason stated, as it is in a way viable for a conducive future of the students for three main ideas.
In a traditional didactic approach, where the lecture is quite boring without any interactions can lead to development of apathy over the subject. In fact, sharing the knowledge with each other is a way more interesting than a banal way to lecture the class. Students learn to develop ideas on their own if the assignments are left at their discretion rather than instructing each and every topic they are supposed to learn. For example, an assignment about aquatic creatures need a more pragmatic approach to analyze it's habitat and ecosystem. Instead of pointing out the features in class, a practical way of visiting the aquarium as a group will surely tend to develop interest among the students.
Forming a team and working on an assignment together can be analogous to the future professional environment the students are putative to face after graduation. Group discussion and ethics at workplace, which forms the predominant mundane role as a team player is a requirement for the efficient workplace etiquette. For instance, the software industry encompasses various portfolios, where the developer develops codes and the tester tests them. Proper communication and timely reporting among various teams is necessary for a software professional to meet their deadlines. Therefore, a group assignment at a college level can enhance the students to develop a strong communication with one another and elaborating each person's ideas for the successful implementation of the assignment. In fact, such activities can be a trial for the student's future as a professional.
Teamwork can in fact develop a leadership quality in students. Though there are more advantages on being a part of the team, there is an ambiguity on whether a full participation among the students is possible. This prevailing ambivalence is tackled by assigning a team leader and varying the role for the next assignments. Therefore, a leader can invigilate the progress of the assignments and keep a watch on the students who are least participated. Also the least participating student finds a role as a leader in the forthcoming assignments which enhances his or her role to monitor others and realize the importance of participation. For example, if a least scorer or a diffident student is given an opportunity to lead the group for completing the assignment, he can improve on his personality. Consequently, he can drive a more complex project for a corporate in the future with arrant confidence.
Of course, few people argue that the traditional way builds a more teacher and student interactive session that is required very much for the institution. However, a group interactive attitude is overweighed when the scenario changes to a professional environment. A good establishment of a teamwork is much necessary than a lecturer- student when a student graduates out of the college and face the reality of circumstances from a perspective that deals with job. Thus, the idea behind segregating the students as a team for assignments must be successful for achieving a common goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...development of apathy over the subject. In fact, sharing the knowledge with each o...
^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he students who are least participated. Also the least participating student finds a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 656, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...tance of participation. For example, if a least scorer or a diffident student is ...
^
Line 4, column 658, Rule ID: LEAST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'least score'?
Suggestion: least score
...nce of participation. For example, if a least scorer or a diffident student is given an oppo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...successful for achieving a common goal.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3041.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14551607445 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14956153032 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48730964467 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 969.3 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.916422131 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.64 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.64 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349136175358 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947909938721 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102549980024 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212010132846 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102098965726 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.