The analysis made by the Leeville chamber of commerce regarding the stress factor attributing to the less sick leaves by the workers can be ambiguous. In my opinion,workers of the Leeville town possibly be immune to one or the other infections that may be lacking in Masonton city. Furthermore,the workers of the small town might be denied a proper health insurance coverage so that the daily wage workers or any informal sector's worker may lose his wage when he is on a sick leave. People would have worked regardless of their health.
Firstly Leeville town must be taken a survey regarding the manpower in formal and informal sector. Informal sector or blue collar workers must at least be provided with a 50% insurance coverage in consulting the doctors and 75% coverage for the pharmacy expenses.
Further to add, Masonton city workers could have more workload compared to that in Leeville town.Workload comparisons must be conducted for both the areas and further actions must be implemented to mitigate the balance in workload for the city workers.However, I agree with the Leeville chamber of commerce regarding the Stress free life lead by the small town people do have positive vibrations on them. Masonton city can implement employee cheer up programs and Go Green initiatives to battle their health related issues.
Finally,Workers regardless of both town and city must follow ergonomics to tackle their health related complications.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 239 350
No. of Characters: 1191 1500
No. of Different Words: 133 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.932 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.983 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.569 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.242 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.428 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , workers
... workers can be ambiguous. In my opinion,workers of the Leeville town possibly be immune...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...be lacking in Masonton city. Furthermore,the workers of the small town might be deni...
^^^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enied a proper health insurance coverage so that the daily wage workers or any in...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...% coverage for the pharmacy expenses. Further to add, Masonton city workers could hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d have more workload compared to that in Leeville town.Workload comparisons must ...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Workload
...load compared to that in Leeville town.Workload comparisons must be conducted for both ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...alance in workload for the city workers.However, I agree with the Leeville chamber of c...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Workers
...le their health related issues. Finally,Workers regardless of both town and city must f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, at least, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 234.0 441.139720559 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18803418803 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92778398436 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 705.55239521 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.3591003769 57.8364921388 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.888888889 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.324526521 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.70786347227 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234705306665 0.218282227539 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964541153696 0.0743258471296 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457872395662 0.0701772020484 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138606413351 0.128457276422 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517876378362 0.0628817314937 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.