It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Although some people thought skills such as music and sports are inherent naturally, other people believe that this intellectual skill can be learned. In my opinion, talents pass to children genetically and this talent cannot be learned accurately by practicing.
On the one hand, some people believe that some individuals are blessed with natural gifts and I think they are true. Passion in playing musical instruments or singing, or playing sports convey from generation to generation. With the motivation of elders, children can achieve a hundred percent of their dreams. As a result, it may help to build their future as well. For instance, many celebrities, musicians from today were child superstars too. However, proper guidance and practice are also needed to be proficient in these fields.
On the other hand, there are certain groups of people who vehemently contend that performing hard work may help to achieve these skills. By practicing and getting proper institutional knowledge any child can be an artist. In a long term, they will able to present their talents to the audience. For example, statics of German children has shown that they are getting outstanding in football by taking proper training. In order to gain excellence in music and sports practice is the secret key to success.
In conclusion, by practicing art and sports anyone can be good at those skills. However, inborn talents should not be neglected. And I think proper guidance and practice can take the gifted child with talents to an excellent level of platform
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14229249012 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66947403871 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1198151727 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3125 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3203025661 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901554270972 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499132502829 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192783318951 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132788843307 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.