Assuredly, these days, people travel to other cities because of their jobs which can be considered as beneficial for both parents and children. I believe that it is a positive development for both parents to migrate and their offsprings to other places for job purposes.
To begin with, there are several benefits of traveling in jobs. First and foremost, parents can earn a higher income because of good job options. This will not only improve their standard of living but also help them to save money for their old age. Secondly, parents will be able to provide quality education and can nurture their children in a better way. As some organizations in few places provide financial benefits to their employees. For instance, children of army officers in India, are provided with a high-quality education in special schools that are available for them.
Furthermore, moving to new places is worthwhile for children too. Primarily, children will become a social animal due to which their communication skills will improve. This skill will help them to travel all over the world without any difficulty. Thus, they will learn how to adapt to different environments conveniently. Additionally, through traveling, they will be able to know about different cultures and languages. Owing to this, they will become multilingual and can attain higher job opportunities in the future.
In conclusion, because of good job opportunities, better nourishment of children and advantages for a child to bring a social as well as multilingual, I am convinced that this development is a positive one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nurture their children in a better way. As some organizations in few places provid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22265625 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9627174523 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56640625 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1234918947 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335339231498 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111840595434 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882346996718 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208870469578 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806148052092 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.