it is a highly debatable issue that medical system development result in higher life expectancy for people but also create negative impacts on their life.
to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of medical technology still to be hot discuss on society who several of them believe that the technology will provide negative and positive effect. This essay totally disagrees with that statement, because the evolution of medical machinery will help to increase medical services in people and monitor the health of patient easier.
Healthy services in the community will be improved by the rising of technology on medical. That is to say that the medical record service on internet that connected in some hospitals will help clinics to know the data of patient and give the best service that suitable with the diagnosis in those data. Center of data on internet will help people to get service fast without recheck before they get next diagnosis. For example, according Google who involved 2000 patients from five famous hospitals in Canada that shared patient medical record. The medical records used to give services in new application that connected in those clinics.
The climbing of medical improvement will help doctor and nurse to control the public health. That is to say that doctor and nurse can use medical technology that linked information technology and computer to monitor heart rate, blood flow or examining organs in patients using x-rays. For instance, one of patient from International Hospital in Jakarta, in 2008, Sueharto, ex president Indonesia used modern technology to monitor and changed his heart that it only needed 3 hours for operate and 2 weeks to recovery. It has faster than normal operation.
On conclusion, the rising of medical technology will help people to get the best medical service and monitor the public health easier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a several'.
Suggestion: who is a several
...logy still to be hot discuss on society who several of them believe that the technology wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, for example, for instance, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21323529412 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55878127078 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6077532564 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881565285181 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375894810163 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280578567659 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689744841235 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280748130185 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.