It is important for the children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Perception on right and wrong needs to be developed in the children at an early age. Some people advocate for punishing the minor to help them understand the difference between good and bad. I strongly disagree with the context and the essay will discuss on the disadvantages of punishing the children along with the modality of punishment by the parents or teachers to the young one regarding teaching them the good manners.
Firstly, Home is the primary school of any children followed by the schools. The distinction between the good and bad, right and wrong and the types of manner inherited by the individuals depends on the environment in which they grow-up. I believe, it is more of a cordial environment around the children than the punishment that helps developing good manners. The children are considered as a raw mud which can be shaped according to the porters wish, thus it more than just a punishment that helps mending their future.
The punishment can have a detrimental effect on the individual psychology. The children might even take the matter wrongly which may even shatter their career and way of thinking. The physical harassment in addition to extortion and mental stress may demotivate the child attending school or maintaining distance from the parents. According to the BBC Nepal report 2019, an average of 10 percent children below the six standards drop out the schools as a result of physical extortion in the schools.
However, I suggest teacher and parents need to stand themselves up as a role model implying the practical distinction of right and wrong doing. Additionally, rewards to the good behavior and discouragement to the bad or wrong doing in a rational manner can be a better solution. Reluctance to the wrong doing can be further checked by making the punishment fit the crime, which may include additional home-works, performing their know-how in front of classroom, fund management through fining in wrong doing, etc which would lead to a long term positive impact on the child.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...children than the punishment that helps developing good manners. The children are conside...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al effect on the individual psychology. The children might even take the matter wro...
^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...atter their career and way of thinking. The physical harassment in addition to exto...
^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a rational manner" with adverb for "rational"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...iscouragement to the bad or wrong doing in a rational manner can be a better solution. Reluctance to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04451038576 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80683620358 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545994065282 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0710830876 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229736921908 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819938227354 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610175117425 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148378533301 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100373266795 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.