Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Is it a positive or negative development?
The world now-a-days have become relatively small in terms of accessibility of similar product and technological advancement sumiting the peak. The issue of similar brands of products available across the countries are creating a common ground among the countries. This essay will shed the lights on detrimental affects of given issue in terms of economy, culture and tradition of the nation.
Tradition and culture of any nation or place is reflected in the products of any place and the way they are being utilized. The introduction of the products from multinational brands possess a threat to the specific traditions and culture, which would be a loss of richness and diversity. National weapon of Nepal Bhojpuri Khukuri or Dhaka cap are the domestic products in Nepal and what will remain the specialty of festivals without them?
Also, the traditional products whether they are medicine, clothes, toys, weapons, etc are the major source of employment of the marginalized households. The spread of multinational products weakens the old-school crafts-persons, attracting the public towards newer fashioned foreign product.
Finally, tourism which is flourishes in the wake of historical, traditional and cultural base of any place is negatively affected. The loss in the charm of expedition arise as a result of ubiquitous nature of products. There is no surprise or motivating factors compelling the visitors to invest on as a souvenir. This effects the overall economic flow through the given sector and loss of interest among the visitors.
To sum up, some people may argue for the availability of the similar product, but I personally say that the local products that suits the social environment needs to be promoted and that faceless uniformity worldwide is not a good option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd loss of interest among the visitors. To sum up, some people may argue for the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34507042254 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98438706563 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6399400532 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137334646522 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441572036053 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452329735463 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736119859326 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412881345921 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.