It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are many people living in disadvantages all around the world nowadays. Meanwhile, many people argue that the aiding concentration should be put on the national population. I am not in favor of this statement.
The first reason for being against the aforementioned argument is that the disadvantaged will benefit from foreign helps. The aid from other countries, especially the rich, reduces the burden of the local communities. For example, many poor countries have been receiving the ODA funds from the developed ones in order to deteriorate nation’s poverty. As a results, social problem, such as illiteracy, hungerness, will become extinct, which helps contribute to the global development. In addition, the international assistance gain solidarity between countries. Vietnam is now helping the two other countries in Indochine continent – Laos and Cambodia – in solving their problems, which helps enhance the relationship among three nations.
The second reason for denying the statement is helping other is humanity moral duty, despite all the difficulties. Many international aid agencies, the Red Cross for instance, have been established with the aim of reducing the disadvantage living condition on any struggling country. However, we cannot rely on the organisation in solving the disadvantage. For example, when a natural catastrophy, such as tsunami in Japan, occurs, these aiding agencies hardly assist the local in fixing the consequence. Other nations should be involved in the situation, since geographical boundaries are gradually fading and the means of aiding are easily accessible recently.
In conclusion, it is obvious that government must tackle urgent problem at their own countries, but they also have duties and moral responsibility to fulfill their aid to the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...o deteriorate nation's poverty. As a results, social problem, such as illiteracy, hu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61454545455 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11323700159 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.988675722 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150357183136 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481449696974 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573191983317 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10767214704 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570960859236 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.