Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others say it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others say it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The issue of choosing type of movies and TV programmes to watch is prevailing. Some people are in favor of those came from foreign countries, the others is keen on national movies and programmes. In my opinion, both types are beneficial.

Foreign movies and TV programmes are good for many purposes. First of all, it helps us to broaden our mind about other nation. Watching documental programmes from other countries not only informs us about other people life condition but also touches us about how they live, how they keep their cultural traddition. Secondly, foreign movies and TV programmes are useful source for studying. In addition to cultural or scientific information, these media can be used to learn foreign languages. An individual learn life knowledge as well as learn the way local people speaking, pronunciation while the person watches the movies and programmes.

On the other hand, domestic movies and TV programmes benefit local people. The media is originated from people in the same country, as a result, it is closer to the audiences in various ways. It is easier to understand about the film, show because of producer caution of audience’s favour. In addition, national entertainments are also appropriate in cultural aspects. For examples, in many TV music shows, the performers dress sexy, which is prohibit in Muslim country.

In conclusion, in terms of culture, national channels and films are as good as oversea-imported programmes.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...grammes benefit local people. The media is originated from people in the same coun...
^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prohibited'.
Suggestion: prohibited
...ws, the performers dress sexy, which is prohibit in Muslim country. In conclusion, in...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96035763424 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572033898305 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4923465928 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2666666667 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309197543423 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990034634875 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562543302171 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173181069007 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516436545911 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.