The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
The given diagram illustrates the number trips with different mode of transport in which children travel from home to school and vice versa in the year 1990 and 2010.
The initial impression can be seen from the graph is children used car more frequent to travel between two years while the number of trips using other mode of transport decreased.
In the year of 1990, children traveled to school on foot the most with over twelve millions trips were made, which is almost double the data of the number of trips used bicycle, walking and bus, and bus (roughly 6.1 millions, 5.9 millions and 7 millions respectively). Throughout 2010, all the figure for these category fell. The number trips in which children walked and walked and used buses dropped to about half of the figure of 1990, compares to a slight reduction in the number of travel made by bus (about 2 millions). The period from 1990 to 2010 witnessed a decrease of number of trips used bicycle, from over 6 millions to 2 millions.
In contrast, the number of car passenger almost tripled, from just over 4 millions in 1990 to about 11 millions in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'these categories'?
Suggestion: this category; these categories
...ly. Throughout 2010, all the figure for these category fell. The number trips in which childre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65989847716 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36294279935 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2617909495 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.142857143 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435686847234 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221557556835 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107211706542 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280830719884 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101115507616 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.