Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others say it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Choosing the appropriate origin of films and television channels to broadcast raises an awareness. Some people are in favor of oversea movies and programmes, the others is keen on national ones. This essay will discuss both views and show that national channels have more benefits for one’s culture.
On one hand, foreign movies and TV programmes are advantegeous for many purposes. First of all, it helps us to broaden our mind about other nations. Documentary programmes from other countries not only informs us about the life condition of foreigns but also teach us about how they live and keep their cultural traditions. In this way, we can adopt some helpful ideas to diversify our cultures without losing the essence. Besides, from the differences between cultures, we can also learn how to improve our culture to adapt the modern world. Secondly, those programmes are quite useful sources for studying foreign languages. Consequently, it will be less complicated for us to introduce directly our cultures to international friends.
On the other hand, domestic movies and TV programmes benefit the culture in several ways when the media is originated from their country. By broadcasting sounds and images, mass media is a good means to educate young generations about their precious long-term national cultures. If the young has no love with their the traditional customs and no dedication is shown to help protect, their exceptional cultures will face with danger of extinction. In addition, national entertainments are also more suitable for the young to maintain their national values. For examples, in many music shows, the performers dress immodestly can badly affect the lifestyle of young people living in the Eastern countries with the preference of elegance.
In conclusion, national channels and films are better ways to keep the charactertistics of one’s culture in comparison with oversea-imported programmes. However, the broadcast station should choose widely the ratio of national to foreign programmes (7 to 3 as an example) in the help of diverse but also distinct cultures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3765060241 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92881846022 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6558962064 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209770812993 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687460789646 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476897393487 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125817361517 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318729128325 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.