It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is believed that is the incompatible relationship between traditional cultures and the improvement of technology. They think that some traditional cultures are lost meanwhile the technology is developing. From my experience, I strongly agree with the argument that traditional cultures and the technology development are incompatible relationship.
The information technology is more modern, people have spent more time using their technology stuff. Hence, people tend to consume their time on some relaxed activities such as playing games or watching movies. Therefore, they do not want to enjoy the traditional events as in the past. Taking Vietnam is an example, people went home on Tet holidays to meet their extended family and their relatives in 2000. However, people, today, travel other countries with their nuclear family after they had a long period of time on working.
The taking place of some traditional culture is the extremely good time to closely contact and connect with others. However, due to the improvement of information technology, people are making the distance between their relationship. People, nowadays, have been using their phone to connect or contact with others by the Internet instead of going outside and face-to-face connect or contact effectively. For instance, Facebook and Messenger, which are systems developed by Facebook company, are popular media apps in the youth generation. Moreover, these apps are a perfect way to keep the relationship without going outside. Besides, the only act they need to do is touch their phone. Therefore, not only will the improvement of technology be lost due to the technology improvement, but the technology development harm negative consequences on people’s lives and bodies.
To sum up, traditional cultures and the technology improvement are the incompatible relationship. Hence, people need to act to keep their traditional events in their countries because of the necessity of national events.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 70
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- After graduation many students take a year to travel Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ir nuclear family after they had a long period of time on working. The taking place of some t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54455445545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05157231368 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511551155116 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7757825071 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8235294118 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307374667714 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1164203043 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123542697244 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232665107951 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133252749422 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.