It is more important to learn about local history than foreign history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Wrire at least 250 words.
People have different views about the teaching of national versus global history in schools. Personally, I support the idea that children should study first and foremost the historical events of their own counties.
There are several reasons why the study of global events could necessary for school pupils. Firstly, these courses provide more knowledge of the world around us. This is largely beneficial, particularly for students who will be nurturing their travel or study overseas dream. At the same time, the students could also compare global events with national ones to better understand the meaning of them. For example, the relation between the First World War and Vietnam declares its independence from France.
In my opinion, schools should focus on teaching national history. From an educational perspective, children enjoy learning about where they live and by studying the ideas, culture and history of their own countries they begin to develop a sense of identity. This is likely to benefit the teachers, who could teach in different ways depending upon the local source materials and design interesting tasks for students such as interviews with local people, especially with the elderly, presentations of slides and historical photographs, and the analysis of various local documents. Furthermore, it creates a connection between generations, meaning that grandparents or parents could talk easier with children by local historical stories.
In conclusion, I would argue that it is undesirable for schools to cover aspects of foreign history, they would ground their pupils in the local culture instead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir pupils in the local culture instead.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.524 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73082844573 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8312032079 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102832569414 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352417802604 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296638885196 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632199194072 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278009210188 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.