It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to
prevent illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, an increasing people are concerned about the purpose of public finance should be harness. However, whether money should utilize for preventing sickness by improvement of a healthy behavior or invest in treatment of patients. My view is that governments should give top priority to invest money for healthy activities in order to prevent sickness in advance.
First, it is obvious that, preventing illness at first place is the optimized method in order to own best health. This is because a healthy life helps to minimize the chance of getting sickness. If we do not get sick, we will not need to go to hospital and suffer from terrible diseases, and of course shirking a large expense for treatment. For example, doing exercise daily strengthen personal heath and diminish rate of using treatment and going to hospital. That means the healthy life enhance the strong of body, leading to reducing forces of treatments.
However, some diseases are inevitable such as cancers, accidental injuries and so on, and should be taken into serious consideration when governments distribute their resources for social activities. Patents have a right to be taken care and be treated by health care system to recover from sickness, in order to become heathy individuals to continue contribute their force for social development. So, governments should not be indifferent with financial aids of medical treatments.
In sum, preventing sickness by living healthy is essential way to reach the mission of enhancing the people quality of life, and should be prioritized for investments. Besides, treating patient is a basic demand of humanity and should be properly invested depend on social real needs. Only by doing so can the average of social health is improved and sustainable, contribute to create the ideal community
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'harnessed'?
Suggestion: harnessed
...the purpose of public finance should be harness. However, whether money should utilize ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, then, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2602739726 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82598788809 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1196989614 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0912678083509 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345326720791 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299869523527 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582781575865 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408640307695 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.