It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to
prevent illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, an increasing people are concerned about the purpose of public finance should be harness. However, whether money should utilize for preventing sickness by improvement of a healthy behavior or invest in treatment of patients. My view is that, two aboved opinions are equally essential.
First, it is obvious that, preventing illness at first place is the optimized method in order to own best health. This is because a healthy life helps to minimize the chance of getting sickness. If we do not get sick, we will not need to go to hospital and suffer from terrible diseases, and of course shirking a large expense for treatment. Thus, investment on improving healthy lifestyle is worth doing due to the benefits not only for personal health, but for social quality of life as well.
However, some diseases are inevitable such as cancers, accidental injuries and so on, and should be taken into serious consideration when governments distribute their resources for social activities. Patents have a right to be taken care and be treated by health care system to recover from sickness, in order to become heathy individuals to continue contribute their force for social development. So, governments should not be indifferent with financial aids of medical treatments.
In sum, preventing and treating sickness are essential processes in mission of enhancing the people quality of life, and should be properly invested depend on social real needs. Only by doing so can the average of social health is improved and sustainable, contribute to create the ideal community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'harnessed'?
Suggestion: harnessed
...the purpose of public finance should be harness. However, whether money should utilize ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23622047244 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82071159689 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633858267717 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9905292838 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0794813740967 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305136106871 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294836926935 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501138016656 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364272925081 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.