It is neither nor useful for a country to provide free university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last few years, a growing number of people have concerned about the phenomenon that a country is not beneficial from providing free university seats for a large number of young millennial, even it is impossible. I totally agree with that contention. For the reasons I will outline below.
On the one hand, it is obvious that there are several significant disadvantages of wasting free space in order to building institutions for students. First and foremost, students probably less sufficient motivation in learning to further their education in university. This is because individuals knowing that they will attend to a college without paying any fee. Studying at college, as the result,will be less effective, and students will concentrate on cultivating their knowledge in their majors, even some want to drop out of school. This will lead to an effective and unqualified labour force in the long run.
On the other hand, I also believe that investing in education by subsidizing tuition fee for all students could be a challenge for the government, even has adversely affected on national budget. Public institution with no fee could waste a great amount of money in nation budget. As the consequence, government perhaps have inadequate money to spend on crucial priorities, including educational researches, improving infrastructure and facilities at school. It is, therefore, the students should take responsibility with their own studies and pay for these expenditures. Otherwise, there are many student loan programs with low-interest rate, for example, which allow them to focus on studying first and repay later after graduation.
After discussing all the points mentioned above, I can finally conclude that student should be responsible for paying their tuition fees instead of government doing that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Thao Phan Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 39
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- It is neither nor useful for a country to provide free university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rom providing free university seats for a large number of young millennial, even it is impossible...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'On the one'?
Suggestion: On the one
... For the reasons I will outline below. On he one hand, it is obvious that there are seve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , will
... fee. Studying at college, as the result,will be less effective, and students will co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, therefore, even so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03001096553 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638596491228 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6294225483 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151055897172 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508650484277 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520488204104 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102184060265 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664845887474 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.