The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table illustrates the land areas set aside for forest planting in six continents over the world from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the total forest areas in Asia, Europe and North America increased while others decreased between 15 years. Moreover, Europe was stand out as the continent occupied by largest area of forest compared with other continents.
As the table shows, in 1990, Europe owned the largest areas for forest, at 989 million hectare. Meanwhile, Africa and South America had slightly lower amounts of forest areas, with 749 and 946 million hectare respectively. At the same time, 708, 576 and just 199 million hectare spent on afforestation by North American, Asian and Oceanian.
In 2005, there was a significant increase of the area for forestry in Europe of 11 million hectare to 1001 million hectare. Similarly, the same trend happened in Asia which were a rise to 584 million hectare. This was still lower than its figures of other continents such as South America, North America, Africa with 882, 705, 691 million hectares respectively. In contrast, Asia's figure was higher than Oceania's which only had 197 million hectare of forest in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... areas in Asia, Europe and North America increased while others decreased between...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
..., Africa and South America had slightly lower amounts of forest areas, with 749 and 9...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, still, while, as for, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08854166667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48615414981 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.475697411 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139148658003 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637589136929 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273343977977 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914518831148 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338982397156 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.