It is now possible foe scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Because of the develop of technology, many people currently can go travel to some distant lands. While it have some advantages in this tendency, I think it also have disadvantages.
One side, travelling to distant lands have some advantages. Firstly, this is the new and interest travel. Going to some cities or different countries was much more popular, so it can be more interesting to discovery a new land such as Antarctic, or Amazon. This will give tourists have many memories and unforgettable experiences. Secondly, when coming to visit the distant lands, especially scientists, can learn many knowledge about the natural environment. For example, coming to North Pole, the scientists can know about the Polar Bear's life-the animal lives far from human.
On the other side, I believe that disadvantages affect much more to the development. First of all, travelling to distant lands can have many risks if the tourists don't have careful preparation. Let take an example, the temperature in Antarctic is very low, and this is not good for their health. To travel to the forests also dangerous because human will be attacked by the wild animals. Beside that, because of going to visit these distant lands should have more investment for research and ensure the carefully of human, so the fee often too expensive. For this reason, may be only scientists and the rich can have enough income for pay these activities. This development may be bring a little bit advantages.
In conclusion, I believe that there are more disadvantages when visiting to the distant lands than the benefits, and this is a negative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Because of the develop of technology, many people currently ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...tages in this tendency, I think it also have disadvantages. One side, travelling to...
^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...lands, especially scientists, can learn many knowledge about the natural environment...
^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...lands, especially scientists, can learn many knowledge about the natural environment. For exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nds can have many risks if the tourists dont have careful preparation. Let take an e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...vities. This development may be bring a little bit advantages. In conclusion, I believe t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07089552239 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84707849932 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0270457688 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18683770438 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717147424632 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476226257649 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124124564294 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017826140258 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.