It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such
as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In this century scientist and tourists have gained to the far circumference such as the South Pole and it leads to a wide range of science achievement. In addition, the pollution of the earth due to these travels. However, it has both pros and cons to do this. In this essay. The advantages and disadvantages will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that these journeys has various positive effects on our generation and people will able to achieve to the highest levels of the science. Besides, by discovering new environments people can gain to a variety of information about history of the earth by finding fossils. For instance, scientist reach many kinds of fossils of animals when they traveled to the South Pole and it leads to increasing their knowledge about the animals and their conditions in many years ago. A recent study by Stanford University found that more than 62 percent of that animals tend to eat meat.
However, these discoveries has irreparable effects on the environment and people damaged the earth unconsciously. These damages consist of air pollution, soil pollution and water pollution. Furthermore, they bother animals or kill them. Various species of animals are the brink of extinction. Hence, these travels are harmful for the earth.
All in all, in spite of the fact that these travels have brilliant effects on science and human beings, people can damage the nature and unfortunately, sometimes these damages are never compensated. Therefor, we should have an effort to take care of our environments and try to not bother them if we have a journey there.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02641509434 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82775744631 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.8969126495 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.25 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147630148605 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490414339074 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602083244781 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940825458379 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826791291971 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.