It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
It is true that thanks to the-state-of-the-art technologies having access to isolated natural areas has been attainable more than ever before. This increasingly progressive trend has several advantages along with some drawbacks, which will be discussed.
On the one hand, being achievable to visit distant locations can be beneficial. On the scientific level, allocating a considerable percentage of virgin areas on the Earth, remote natural habitats help scientists to gain a profound insight into the planet in which we are living. For instance, each part of the Earth has its exclusive features in terms of geological issues, assisting geologists to discover unknown facts associated to creation of the Earth, resulting in the possibility of making prediction about future. From an individual perspective, travelling will change into a repetitive and exhausting activity unless people are able to go to new and thrilling places like South Pole. In fact, not only would it be a once in their lifetime experiences, but they would also learn more about their planet.
However, the arguments mentioned above can be considered from the opposite angle. Firstly, conducting comprehensive studies is required to provide essential facilities, such as appointed libraries and various equipment just to name, leading to disturb these virgin natural environments, which may cause the distinction of some scarce species. Secondly, not having enough information about different flora and fauna living in remote areas, tourists may damage the environment or even put themselves in explosion to dangerous situations. As an obvious example, polar bears being found in South and North Poles are not only attractive for visitors but also risky in terms of attacking.
In conclusion, although finding the way in distant natural regions brings several benefits to human, its negative impacts should also be taken into account.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53924914676 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01489041839 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675767918089 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4058260073 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1589268761 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461860538218 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333875647519 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787988012589 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325796104417 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.