It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects.
What are the causes? And what will be effected on society?
In recent years, many countries have seen a decline in the number of students taking up science subjects. In my opinion, there are several explanations for the inadequacy of science students and this situation has had undoubtedly negative impacts on social development.
The main reason leading to the lack of students in science field is that sciences are highly demanding fields. First, not all people are able to absorb scientific knowledge, not to mention the possibility of achieving success. Second, even if a person is extraordinarily well qualified to pursue this field, he or she has to invest a great deal of time and effort. Take medical students as a classic example, they must spend nearly 13 hours daily on average in the lab to conduct experiments. This example makes it clear how demanding it is to pursue a career in science.
This current problem definitely has adverse effects on the labour market segmentation. The proportion of the population trained in sciences cannot meet the demand for workers needed in some countries. As an inevitable result, there is an uncontrolled growth in the workforce in other sectors. In this case, the unemployment rate will increase dramatically and the nation, as well as the global economy, can be damaged. In addition, not enough scientists also leads to the lack of breakthroughs which can benefit human beings in all aspects from healthcare to technology.
In conclusion, the characteristics of science such as the difficulty level and the investment in time and effort are the main obstacle contributing to the lack of students studying the sciences. In the long run, unless this issue is addressed, the community will have to face unbalanced development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ects from healthcare to technology. In conclusion, the characteristics of scie...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lack of students studying the sciences. In the long run, unless this issue is addr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16785714286 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00779387252 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5183952556 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179023739537 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532679223999 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531549810521 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106055102504 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409107927064 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.