It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects.
What are the causes? And what will be effected on society?
In recent years, many countries have witnessed a decline in the number of students taking up science subjects. In my opinion, there have been several explanations for the inadequacy of science students and this situation has had undoubtedly negative impacts on the general development.
The main reason leading to the lack of students in science field is that science is considered as the most highly demanded area. First, not all individuals are able to absorb science knowledge, not to mention the possibility of achieving success. Second, even if a person is extraordinarily well qualified to pursue this field, he or she has to invest a great deal of effort from time to energy in it. To take medical students as a classic example, they must spend nearly 13 hours daily on average in the lab to conduct experiments. This instance makes it clear how demanding it is when being involved with science.
This current problem definitely has had adverse effects on the labour market segmentation. The proportion of the population trained in science areas cannot meet the number of workers needed in some countries. As an inevitable result, there is an uncontrolled growth in the number of workforce in other sectors. In this case, the unemployment rate will increase dramatically and the nation, as well as the global economy, can be damaged. In addition, not enough scientists also leads to the lack of breakthroughs which can benefit human beings in all aspects from healthcare to technology.
In conclusion, the characteristics of science such as the difficulty level and the investment demand are the main obstacles contributing to the lack of students doing sciences. In the long run, unless this issue is addressed, the community will have to face an unbalanced development.
- The following bar chart illustrates the mobile phone ownership in ten European countries throughout the year from 2005 to 2010 92
- "Some countries encourage students to have part-time jobs and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views." 61
- The chart shows the number of days the average employee has off work per year in 4 different countries 34
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects.What are the causes? And what will be effected on society? 84
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country. Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ects from healthcare to technology. In conclusion, the characteristics of scie...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to the lack of students doing sciences. In the long run, unless this issue is addr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15120274914 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99191764437 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8641016949 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174476765533 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055066383003 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474258776698 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10261879555 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339264466356 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.