It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject. What are causes? And what will be effect on society?h
It is true that the number of students ignoring science subjects is rising in many countries. This trend is orginated from various factors, and it has imposed several impacts on society as well.
There are several reason why fewer students have choosen science as their major. Firstly, these subjects are perveived as demanding and difficult, which required students to put much effort and a tons of reading to convey. Thus, the reluctance of various individuals to embark on subjects such as biology, physics or chemistry, which they fear too challenging, is understanable. Secondly, as there are limited employment opportunities available for graduates in science field, young people have been showing a current propensity of pursuing other subjects such as economics or tourism, which allow them to secure a job easily.
Having an insufficient number of learners in science field undoubtedly leads to several consequences. The first impact is that research instituations or organizations unsuprisingly confront with a shortage of highly qualified employees working in science field. Therefore, this would leads to less innovation that can afford is a better life. For example, if there is no futher development in solar and wind power, human being will have no choice but using natural resources such as oil or coal. As the result, pollution problems will escalate and threaten people's health. Another negative impact is the imbalance in work-market, which is attributed to the surplus number of student in favour of popular majors as communication or bussiness administration. Therefore, the majority of gradutes would have to face unemployment, leading to the burden on society.
In conclusion, various consequences have resulted from the lack of students following a major as science, which are certain to arise due to the mentioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a ton' or simply 'tons'?
Suggestion: a ton; tons
...equired students to put much effort and a tons of reading to convey. Thus, the relucta...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...in science field. Therefore, this would leads to less innovation that can afford is a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44791666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0284924456 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3545571369 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137400850102 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485610135427 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446889144754 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087531651581 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449407334015 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.