It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject.
What are causes? And what will be effects on society?
There is a lack in the number of science subject students that can be seen in certain nations. This essay will explain the root of this phenomenon and also elicit some social impacts of it.
There are two major factors leading to the diminish of science-major students in terms of quantity. Firstly, the disinterest in science subjects can be derived from the requisite characteristics such as diligence, intelligence and patience. Mathematics is one salient example for the challenging of scientific-data analyzing subject, which include an excessive amount of work and the difficulty of math problems is of unnecessity compares to other subject learned at school, hence discouragement from choosing it as students’ major. Secondly, although science subject requires high commitment but the reward for the sacrifice is minor. Science degree holders usually find little chance in applying for jobs because of intense competitiveness in the same field, not to mention, income from science-related jobs is unworthy compare to extreme tension that these people suffer.
Society greatly suffers from the scarcity of human resource in science fields. First to mention, as the number of science experts become insignificance, other majors such as business and politics apparently are prevalent to people, which lead to the imbalance of workforce. In fact, the difference in the number of workers among areas will push a great deal of graduates to the verge of unemployment. Another problem is the shortage of science professionals as qualified employees will potentially become a deterrent of social development process.
In conclusion, hinders regarding some strict requirements of science subjects and little opportunities of employment are the explanation to the reducing number of student approaching to these subjects, and there are detrimental problems arising from this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... There are two major factors leading to the diminish of science-major students in terms of q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63986013986 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1926140525 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3330899529 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191159985467 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074627940905 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394959166948 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114012562286 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028119179154 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.