It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?
Due to the deterioration of the wildlife, the government has invested an enormous amount of money to protect the nature. Nevertheless, it is often argued that there are more urgent problems which need to be addressed. In my point of view, I wholeheartedly believe that the authority should spend money on reserving the wildlife.
At the outset, there is no denying that the wildlife plays an integral part in the development of the human race. Initially, it has made great contribution to boost the economy, help people upgrade their living standard. In the past few decades, wildlife tourism has become a powerful tool countries can leverage to grow and diversify their economics while preserving their biodiversity. Furthermore, the world’s species supply people with a large number of life-saving medicines such as quinine, aspirin as well as many cancers. Foe example, the World Health Organization estimates that in many developing countries, 80 percent of the population relies on traditional remedies from nature. In addition to that, wildlife also is a momentous contributing factor in the formation of distinct cultures. Plethora of flora and fauna represents the cultural backbone of the community and also regarded the emblematic of the each nation.
Last but not least, it is crucial for the government along with the individuals take proactive measures to conserve the wildlife to maintain the biodiversity and a healthy ecosystem. The ecosystem is the connection between different organisms in the food webs and food chain. If a single species is driven to the verge of extinction, this will definitely exert a profound impact o the whole animals and plants in the food chain, which can lead to disastrous results. Besides, many micro organisms, bacteria, fungi, etc feed on plants, animal waste, decomposing them, which is the most pivotal element producing nutrients for plants.
To sum up, in my perspective, the government should take the responsibility to preserve the wildlife.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...world's species supply people with a large number of life-saving medicines such as quinine, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34384858044 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02654057547 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634069400631 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8217256324 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109811604695 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035980693937 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543965982145 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861847646601 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941026888833 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.