It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?
Some people say that governments are giving priority to the conservation of wildlife, while other problems are more necessary to solve. In my opinion, I agree with this because problems within society such as the shortage of accommodation should not be dismissed.
In some parts of the world, governments tend to invest a great deal of money and resources in protecting wildlife because the trend of exploiting wild animals for personal purposes is increasingly evident. For example, two-horn rhinos have recently been extinct due to the excessive exploitation and hunting, believing that their horns could be a medical treatment. However, many scientists have proved that their horns do not contain any valuable compounds to help people get rid of their illnesses. Therefore, making an effort to prevent this problem from happening in the first place is necessary to maintain the existence and diversity of numerous species.
However, apart from the reason expressed above, while protecting wildlife is important to some extent, the deficiency of accommodation within society should be taken into address. Nowadays, people, especially who are immigrants, tend to move to big cities and metropolises to settle down. However, they often find it extremely difficult to find a house or an apartment, which results from overpopulation and the increased housing price. This poses a problem to people as they have to live in low-quality residential areas or even slums, which adversely affect their living standard. This suggests that governments need to implement proper policies by investing money in different priorities to tackle this problem.
In conclusion, although it is certainly of great significance for governments to invest their budget in the protection of wildlife, they also need to pay proper attention to the shortage of housing, which requires adequate funds from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...o address. Nowadays, people, especially who are immigrants, tend to move to big cities ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47781569966 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92989846251 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600682593857 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0388673079 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173416373687 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608631468904 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593233453464 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11047691905 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542490336082 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.