There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher. What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?
Some say that global warming, which is accelerated by human activities, is increasingly evident. From my perspective, while burning fossil fuels is the predominant cause of this problem, proper solutions need to take into account.
The main reason that makes burning fossil fuels become the major cause of global warming is due to the excessive usage of cars and other vehicles within society. In order to power these transports, petroleum and diesel are of necessity to function properly. However, this process would release toxic gases into the atmosphere, which accordingly causes air pollution. Taking Vietnam as an example, where motorbikes account for the majority of most vehicles on the streets, they usually emit carbon dioxide, worsening the air quality. This example indicates that not only could air pollution effects heighten the global temperature but also increase the susceptibility to different types of disease, especially ones related to the respiratory system.
However, alongside the negative influence of fossil fuels, I believe that several solutions should not be dismissed to cope with this problem. First, governments should give priority to the encouragement of using public transports among local citizens because most advanced public transports are designed to use electricity, which is more eco-friendly than that of fossil fuels. Consequently, if harmful gases are cut from the air, environmental problems such as global warming will be minimized. Second, schooling and parental guidance towards youngsters should include the action of planting more trees because vegetation could absorb carbon dioxide from the air and release oxygen back into it. Hence, this not only enhances the air quality but also ease the global temperature.
In conclusion, although man-made activities have recently posed several problems, I believe that the mention solutions above would have a positive impact on the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65202702703 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.802219768 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641891891892 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2866119387 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.692307692 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178673081608 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555261789538 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389820248021 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977974852307 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145501184786 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.