It is said that the best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The problem in the environment has been one of the world’s greatest concern, nowadays. There are claims that the most effective solution to this problem is increasing fuel prices. In my opinion, decrease fuel consumption could help curb environmental damage but it would create consequences if the price will be increased. I believe that in protecting the environment, there are many activities that could be employed, other than the fuel price increase.
Undoubtedly, increasing fuel prices could create a decrease in consumption and demand which will in turn decrease environmental damage caused by fuel. As in the case of coal, if it will be taxed highly and its price increased, people, factories, or governments will resolve in finding an alternative to this form of fuel. This strategy could be employed but with negative consequences, especially to the economy.
This increase in fuel price could lead to economic decline in many countries, especially in developing ones. It could be noted that fuel, such as coal is also used in the production of many goods. In this case, the prices of other products will also increase which will create a burden to poor communities. This would be an added financial constraint to many people despite it’s a positive effect on nature, many families and communities will suffer if there would be no alternative approach.
Additionally, many activities are available in saving the environment without increasing the prices of fossil fuels. There are regulations such as banning the use of plastics or promoting the use of renewable forms of energy. For instance, communities could transform their energy sources to use solar instead of relying on coal. Also, individuals could recycle plastics and buy only biodegradable products in order to lessen waste and pollution. Thus, instead of putting a burden on the consumer with fuel increases, other activities need to be adopted to combat environmental damage.
To conclude, there is no one single best practice to solve environmental damages, not even increasing the fuel price. I believe it is in the collective effort of authorities and individuals that could mitigate environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-03 | Friezzy | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-14 | Shivampatan143 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-13 | nerkardhanu@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | nguyenngocnga7916 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-28 | sophiemetropolis | 73 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions 78
- Some think that governments should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that to lead a successful life a university degree is important Others believe that this is no longer true nowadays Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s increasing fuel prices. In my opinion, decrease fuel consumption could help cur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31896551724 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00911741555 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3313007374 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198681577221 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758448370262 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684632111872 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139924789649 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667292983539 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s increasing fuel prices. In my opinion, decrease fuel consumption could help cur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31896551724 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00911741555 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3313007374 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198681577221 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758448370262 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684632111872 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139924789649 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667292983539 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.