It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages?
In this fast-growing generation, electronic equipment and means of transportation are considered to be necessities of life. The largest proportion of people needs this thing in their life.
In my opinion, I think that a car, a television and a bridge can bring about more benefits for society in the long run compared to any advantage It might bring.
Despite the drawback below, I believe in the benefits, the first benefit of this is that it's made life batter. Firstly, a fridge helps to store many things like vegetables, beans and many things that we can not keep open. It keeps food items hygiene that we can eat them anytime. Secondly, a car helps us in different ways, it saves our times also reduce the cost of translation and also useful in some emergencies. Moreover, television is a source of entertainment and knowledge. By watching television, people can stay in touch with their society and also able to know about the daily news. For example, some people have full-time jobs and after working hours they get good entertainment by watching television.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages of owning such items. First of all, an increasing number of cars on the road can cause traffic problems and also reduce the speed of travel. Moreover, the fuel used in cars and other vehicles cause the ozone layer. Even the use of a refrigerator can harmful to the ozone layer which can reduce the protection from ultraviolet rays. In addition to this, television takes children and teenagers in the wrong way. By watching it they learn to do different kinds of activities like stunts and also imitate the violence which can prove lethal for them and also they spend their time watching television which makes them obese and causes their health.
To conclude, the necessity of attaining this thing can be obvious to a better lifestyle. The advantage of traveling, storage, and entertainment weigh up the disadvantages like a traffic jam, climate change, and health issues due to their usage beyond the limits. That is why having this item makes life easygoing if it is used in limit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | giangngoc | 11 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | shivangini | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | iamketpatel | 82 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- The diagram below illustratres how bees produced honey summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make a comparison where relevant 90
- The diagram below illustratres how bees produced honey summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make a comparison where relevant 90
- The map below show the village of stokeford In 1930 And in 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make it comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89106145251 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7120430935 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4060899259 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1578947368 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184729111787 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534759588496 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358296289529 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106283385476 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034019484469 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.